Prosecutor Misconduct No. 1675029610 - 268224964

Christopher Rehak
619 2nd Street, Suite 140
Radford, Virginia 24141

Reporting Authority

This complaint has been forwarded to the Virginia State Bar

Statement

Christopher rehak has been using an inherently incredible witness since before 2015 and every case that files for the Brady motion once presented he objects and it is allowed. The case for 2015 was one of 3 cases that have filed for the motion. On 08/29/2022 he objected the Brady once again in a trial and the judge accepted that and didn't allow it once again. The informant he is using has perjury charges, drug charges, stealing charges and has caught felonies while working for the same Detective and Mr. Rehak just to get convictions and is making everyone take a plea or they are given 20 years.

Definition of Offense(s)

Prosecutor misconduct involving bias refers to when a prosecutor allows personal opinions, prejudices, or other factors to influence their decision making or behavior in a criminal case.


Coercive plea bargaining refers to the practice of using excessive pressure, threats, or other tactics to force a defendant to accept a plea bargain, even if it is against their best interest.


Evidence that is favorable to the defendant (exculpatory) and could impact the outcome of the defendant’s case (material) is often called “Brady material” because of the seminal 1963 U.S. Supreme Court case, Brady v. Maryland.


Suborning perjury is a type of prosecutor misconduct where the prosecutor encourages or induces a witness or a defendant to provide false testimony under oath in a court of law.