Los Angeles County District Attorney

211 West Temple Street, Suite 1200
Los Angeles, California 90012

The Los Angeles County District Attorney Brady List includes all known issues of misconduct, do not call status, decertification, public complaints, use-of-force reports, and citizen reports. Los Angeles County District Attorney is not in compliance with the nationwide, public-facing, platform of record: The Brady List; or:

Body

The Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office presents a substantial Brady/Giglio failure when it prosecutes cases while relying on testimony, reports, declarations, recommendations, or investigative work from Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department personnel or Los Angeles County Probation Department personnel without making complete impeachment disclosures concerning known institutional misconduct, credibility defects, gang-affiliation evidence, abuse allegations, falsified reporting, retaliation, obstruction, failure to supervise, and concealment practices. Brady requires prosecutors to disclose favorable exculpatory evidence, Giglio makes impeachment evidence part of that constitutional disclosure duty, and Kyles places responsibility on the prosecutor to learn of and disclose favorable evidence known to the police or investigative team rather than allowing law-enforcement agencies to become the final arbiters of disclosure.  In light of the LASD deputy-gang problem, which describes parallel loyalty networks, falsified reporting, obstruction, retaliation, and prosecutorial-system failure, and the Probation Department juvenile hall settlements, which describes concealed abuse, deficient reporting, failure to track misconduct, and undisclosed credibility issues affecting probation witnesses, LADA’s failure to affirmatively disclose this material converts agency misconduct into prosecutorial misconduct. The constitutional defect is therefore not limited to individual officers or isolated cases; it attaches to the prosecutorial decision to use compromised government witnesses while withholding the institutional facts necessary for defendants, defense counsel, judges, and juries to assess credibility, bias, motive, truthfulness, and reliability.

Prosecutors have ethical obligations and may be held individually accountable under the Rules of Professional Conduct [R.P.C.] for their conduct within the legal system. Violations of these Rules can result in disciplinary actions which may include sanctions, suspension, or disbarment.

This information has been curated by journalists and private citizens; and, this platform is available as-a-service to all Peace Officer Standards & Training [POST] DepartmentsProsecutors, and Law Enforcement Organizations [LEOrgs].