Date of Offense
Statement
I was falsely arrested on 30 June 2023 for "disorderly conduct" by a deputy who lost control of himself and drew a weapon in a public building, shouted threats at me then falsified an arrest.
The deputy was fired approximately 2 weeks later for similar conduct.
1. The arrest lacked RAS let alone probable cause, the judge NEVER verified the claim.
2. There were never any witnesses or video (this took place in the courthouse behind a metal detector with multiple cameras) to corroborate the false allegations, I was deprived of any evidence because no evidence was ever collected.
3. Allen was fired for misconduct 2 weeks after the alleged incident but the jidge (a magistrate with no prosecutor and no bar license) held the charges without a witness, evidence, probable cause or any legitimate legal backing.
4. The charges were dropped in court after the fired deputy was "unable to be located", why did the judge cling to this malicious prosecution?
The entire case rests entirely on the attached (falsified) report as no other evidence or statements were collected.
The attached report reads more like a confession of a deliberat depravation of rights rather than a broken law.
The alleged fingerprinting never happened and is in no way a threat, just the word "threatening" thrown in to validate the unhinged deputy's threats of violence.
There is a clear excessive force admission for the taser threat after the (false) claim that I was told that I was "under arrest". Even if I were "under arrest" for curse words, the use or threat if use of a taser is a direct violation of use of force.
The judge was more interested in money, fines and her own self importance than the law itself.
18 USC 242 and 18 USC 241 (conspiracy) since Silcox signed off without gathering evidence or any investigation of any kind, are the actual charges that the judge should have approved, against the SCSO
