Amy Sieminski
P.O. Box 112
Trenton, New Jersey 08625
Date of Offense
January 4, 2024
Reporting Authority
This complaint has been forwarded to the New Jersey State Bar Association
Supporting Document(s)
Statement
DAG. Amy Sieminski failed to disclose Det. John Barnett's written notes until 1/4/2024, more than one year after I civilly sued her on 12/5/2022 for suborning perjury. This caused my criminal attorney unable to impeach John Barnett and Sgt. Jospeh Villalta-Moran about their contradictory testimony under oath during the 12/15/2023 testimonial hearing. Thankfully, Jospeh Villalta-Moran admitted the existence of the concealed notes during cross-examination, and Amy Sieminski ultimately produced the notes. With that notes, Honorable Mitzy Galis-Menendez found that Amy Sieminski violated Brady-Giglio rules, and finally granted my criminal attorney's motion to suppress evidence. Although Hon. Mitzy Galis-Menendez could not say that their conduct was willful or outrageous, but she agreed that their conduct was at very least due to palpable negligence. Given the fact I have civilly sued all three (Sieminski, Barnett, and Villalta-Moran), I can conclude their actions were intentionally against me as retaliations.
