Improper Political Activities

Improper Political Activities occur when a judge engages in partisan political conduct inconsistent with the independence and neutrality required of the judiciary. This includes direct involvement in campaigns, endorsements, fundraising, or public advocacy for political candidates, parties, or causes. Judges must refrain from political activity that creates an appearance of bias, compromises impartiality, or uses the prestige of judicial office to advance partisan interests.

Key Features:

• Partisan Endorsements: Publicly supporting or opposing candidates, parties, or political platforms.

• Campaign Involvement: Participating in fundraising, organizing events, or using judicial resources to benefit a political effort.

• Use of Judicial Title: Leveraging judicial office in political advertising, endorsements, or advocacy.

• Improper Public Advocacy: Making speeches or statements on controversial political issues that suggest alignment with partisan positions.

• Erosion of Neutrality: Conduct that undermines the expectation of independence, impartiality, and separation of the judiciary from politics.

Illustrative Example:
A sitting judge appearing at a campaign rally to endorse a candidate for governor, or using court letterhead to solicit donations for a political party.