Complaint No. 1774219181 - 191354268

Travis Page
325 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Way, Suite 2003
Gastonia, North Carolina 28052

Reporting Authority

This complaint has been forwarded to the North Carolina State Bar

Supporting Document(s)

Statement

This complaint is submitted for Brady and Giglio disclosure, tracking, and credibility review concerning conduct that is material, prejudicial, and impeachable, and that directly affects the integrity of proceedings in which the above-named prosecutor participates.
This submission makes no admissions, and is submitted without waiver of rights.

STATEMENT OF OBSERVED FACTS
(Based on firsthand observation and personal knowledge)
1. It has yet to be proven that the Gaston County District Attorney’s Office is operating as a lawful public office of trust, held for the benefit of the people, supported by a valid oath and bond.
2. Despite this unresolved issue of public-trust authority, the prosecutor has acted in a manner demonstrating prejudice and lack of neutrality, rather than impartial administration of justice.
3. An individual identified as Jason St. Aubin never filed a notice of appearance and was never counsel of record in the referenced matter.
4. Notwithstanding the absence of any appearance or authority, the prosecutor assisted in or facilitated the removalof this individual as though lawful representation existed, creating a false or misleading procedural posture.
5. The prosecutor and Jason St. Aubin were personally observed exiting into a private room together.
6. The undersigned remained outside the closed door for more than ten (10) minutes while the two remained inside.
7. During that time, extended conversation was overheard, reasonably indicating discussion related to the matter.
8. These communications occurred:
* Outside the presence of the interested party
* Without notice or consent
* Outside any lawful proceeding
9. The records were altered or caused alteration of Odyssey electronic records, including:
* Adding names
* Removing information
* Modifying entries
10. The Odyssey online record does not match the physical or official case file, creating discrepancies in the public and internal record.
11. These alterations were made without notice, explanation, or lawful process, and materially affect transparency, accuracy, and reliability of the record.
12. The matter is prejudicial because:
* The same institutional actors are effectively bringing the claim, managing the process, and adjudicating outcomes
* All involved parties operate within the same team or authority structure
* There is no meaningful separation of powers
13. This consolidation of roles creates an appearance and reality of institutional bias, undermining fairness and due process.
14. No injured party has been identified, and no independent harm has been established.
Any alleged “injury” appears to arise solely from police or court action, not from criminal conduct.

BRADY / GIGLIO SIGNIFICANCE
The above facts constitute material impeachment and credibility information, including but not limited to:
* Ex parte communications
* Participation in procedural irregularities
* Assistance in removing a non-appearing attorney
* Alteration or manipulation of official electronic records
* Lack of separation of powers
* Demonstrated prejudice and conflict
* Failure to establish neutral public-trust authority
These matters fall squarely within Brady and Giglio disclosure obligations and must be retained and disclosed as required.

PREJUDICE AND CONFLICT CONCERN
Based on the conduct described, the prosecutor has placed himself in a conflicted and prejudicial position, incompatible with the role of a neutral minister of justice.
Continued participation under these circumstances compromises integrity, fairness, and public confidence.

REQUESTED BRADY ACTION
This complaint is submitted for:
1. Entry into Brady/Giglio records
2. Preservation of all Odyssey logs, edit histories, and access records
3. Preservation of all communications involving the prosecutor and Jason St. Aubin
4. Disclosure where required by law
5. Credibility and fitness review
6. Confirmation of receipt

GOOD-FAITH NOTICE
This submission is made in good faith, based on direct observation, for accountability and transparency purposes only, without admission, waiver, or concession of any kind.
All rights reserved special deposit